True Chicago story. Saturday, 3 p.m. Corner of State & Washington. The man is passing out little mint-green leaflets and waves of urgent energy are cascading off him and rippling around us passers-by. i always take flyers, & i usually read them, too. i read this one waiting for the light to change (it's short-n-sweet):
"RALLY IN SUPPORT OF FIELD'S -- SUN., 5-6, 1 p.m.!"
I want to start screaming.
This is what you care about?! Do you know that there's a war on? The light changes. i don't scream. i walk. There's a sale at Urban Outfitters, & i kinda want a new, cute hat for summer.
Continue reading "Marshall Field's protest set to liberate humanity & the earth" »
No kidding.
Mairead Corrigan (now Corrigan-Maguire) shared the Nobel Prize for Peace in 1976 with Betty Williams. The 2 women organized 300-thousand women to march against the fighting between the Republican and loyalist communities in Northern Ireland.
But a Nobel Prize won't keep Israeli soldiers from shooting you with a rubber-coated steel bullet. Rubber bullets and other "less lethal" weapons frequently main and kill, despite their name.
Continue reading "Israelis try to whack Nobel Peace Prize winner" »
Local Chicago radical blogger Steve Lendman has a review of Chris Hedges'
2006 book, American Fascists, on his own blog, and on Chicago Indymedia.
We face a new, historically unique danger in the U.S. today.
The "fascist" epithet has been sorrily misused to describe presidential administrations that were merely nasty (Nixon, Reagan) or movements that had conservative sexual morality and a tendency toward violence (Operation Rescue).
Thinking activists on the left are skeptical: The "F-word" is inflammatory, and can be a total conversation-stopper.
But Hedges and another liberal intellectual, Joe Conason, correctly identify the authentically fascist nature of both those currently in power and the growing mass movements on the right.
Continue reading "The fascism argument" »
That's 76 in human years.
Among the great accomplishments of "Russia's first freely-elected leader" --
1) During the 1991 coup against Gorby, Yeltsin, mayor of Moscow, climbed on a tank and gave the speech of his career. (He didn't say, "Have another drink, dammit!" even once.) After that, Boris-baby had a real thing for tanks. A few years later, the Chechens hurt some of his tanks. So he bombed Grozny flat.
Continue reading "Boris "Have-Another-Drink, Dammit" Yeltsin is dead at age 1,245" »
A heart surgeon, a crusty punk, and Judge Posner are on an airplane that's going down. The pilot has already bailed out, and there are only 2 parachutes left. They're discussing who should get the parachutes.
Continue reading "Joke du jour" »
The obvious point (the one that all pro-choice people get) is that there is no such thing as “partial-birth abortion.” Others have eloquently made the point that the propagandistic misnomer is medically meaningless.
But it has always been a dangerous mistake to think that the anti-choicers, or the authors of the 2003 “Partial-Birth Abortion” Ban Act itself ("the Act"), intended to rename, demonize, and ban a particular procedure as a mere wedge strategy.
The mistake seems to be continuing, intractable: Wednesday and Thursday, pro-choice bloggers were (good) angry and (bad) fearful that Carhart will prove the narrow end of the wedge; that, with one more conservative justice, a future Supreme Court will overturn Roe.
This fear utterly misses what Carhart has actually accomplished.
As of Wednesday, April 18, 2007, Roe is irrelevant. Thursday marked Day One of the Post-Roe Era.
Here’s why:
1) The only issue is the Act’s intentionally-vague language.
2) Every single word about “trimesters” and “pre-“ and “post-viability” is a red herring. That language belongs to the Roe era, and the Roe era is over. We lost.
3) The vagueness of the Act’s language was always smart, intentional, and strategic, and was never an accidental by-product of dumb anti-choicers who can’t write and don’t understand medicine.
Continue reading "Carhart makes overturning Roe irrelevant. What is to be done?" »
Bus Driver called pretty early this morning. He was in between routes and had parked the bus and was sipping tea from a thermos. I wanted his thoughts on Carhart because that's the only thing I cared about at that moment, but I couldn't get more than, "Wow," out of him. Instead, he started describing what he was looking at, and what he was thinking about what he was looking at. (Sleepnessness and science-illiteracy warning: If any working scientist reads this and goes, "That doesn't make any sense," it's my mistake in rendering the conversation. I hadn't slept, and there's no way I'll ever understand even basic concepts such as refraction and reflection.)
Continue reading "Physicist explains in real time how he sees stuff" »
Recent Comments